服务粉丝

我们一直在努力
当前位置:首页 > 财经 >

「经济学人」Lunar living

日期: 来源:LearnAndRecord收集编辑:

Lunar living
Pressurised natural caves could offer a home from home on the Moon

It would make building bases a lot cheaper and easier

Imagine a habitable colony on Mars or the Moon and the kinds of structures that come to mind are probably gleaming domes or shiny metallic tubes snaking over the surface. But with no Earth-like atmosphere or magnetic field to repel solar radiation and micrometeorites, space colonists would probably need to pile metres-thick rocks and geological rubble onto the roofs of such off-world settlements. More like a hobbit hole than Moonbase Alpha.


There could be another solution, however, that would offer future colonists safer and far more expansive living space than any cramped base built on the surface. Writing in Acta Astronautica, Raymond Martin, an engineer at Blue Origin, a rocket company, and Haym Benaroya, an aerospace engineer at Rutgers University, explore the benefits of setting up a Moon base inside giant geological tunnels that lie just below the lunar surface.


First discovered during the Apollo programme, these lunar lava tubes are a legacy of when Earth’s nearest celestial neighbour was geologically hyperactive, with streams of boiling basaltic magma bursting from the interior to flow across the Moon’s surface as lava. Found on Earth (see picture), and identified on Mars, lava tubes form when the sluggish top layer of a lava stream slows and cools, forming a thick and rocky lid that is left behind when the rest of the lava underneath eventually drains away.


Lava tubes on Earth are usually up to 15 metres wide and can run for several kilometres. But the reduced gravity on the Moon makes them hundreds of times bigger, creating colossal cave systems that are up to a kilometre across and hundreds of kilometres long.


Space scientists have long identified these lava caves as a likely site for human habitation on the Moon, because the thick walls and ceiling offer protection from the harsh radiation striking the Moon’s surface. But Mr Martin and Dr Benaroya went a step further. Rather than simply situating a Moon base inside a lava tube—domes and shiny buildings and all—they suggested that a section of such a tube could be pressurised with breathable air. Residents could live, work and sleep inside the pressurised tubes with no need for space suits and with plenty of spare real estate for some low-gravity recreation. And although the costs and details need more planning, it could end up cheaper than having to send from Earth everything needed to survive on the lunar surface.


In their latest study, the two scientists crunched some numbers on what might be possible. “One of the first big hurdles there is proving that they [the lava tubes] are structurally sound,” says Mr Martin. To find out, he and Dr Benaroya built a computer model to simulate the integrity of a relatively small lava tube in the Moon’s Oceanus Procellarum (Ocean of Storms), which was photographed by the Indian Chandrayaan-1 lunar probe 15 years ago.


After checking several combinations of internal pressure and roof thickness, and whether the resulting structure was stable, the study suggested a lava tube with a roof thickness of ten metres could be safely pressurised to almost the same conditions found at sea level on Earth. The scientists also showed that the overall pressure (and so the risk of roof failure) could be reduced by increasing the proportion of oxygen in the artificial air used to fill the caverns. And given the awkwardness of moving around in a space suit, the study looked at how astronauts could get themselves and their equipment safely in and out of the tubes. The best option, it concluded, would be to build the entrance where a wall of the lava tube had naturally collapsed open.


Knowing that the roof will not fall in should give engineers the confidence to work on other aspects of the idea, such as how to use inflatable structures to cap the ends of a pressurised section of the tube. Such membranes are already used for flood prevention in tunnels on Earth, where they can be quickly deployed to block incoming floodwater. Another issue is whether the lava tube’s ceiling would be fully airtight, and if not, how to seal it to prevent leaks. And, of course, how to prepare humanity for a return to life in caves.


This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline "Lunar living" (Mar 15th 2023)

我没有译文,仅供拓展阅读

LearnAndRecord

2015年2月8日

2023年3月24日

第2967天

每天持续行动学外语

相关阅读

  • 【成都线下活动报名】复苏前瞻:旧常识与新思维

  • 社会恢复常态推动了经济的快速复苏,但全球经济远未走出通胀,中国经济尚需时间修复信心。应对不确定性,需要恢复旧常识,拥抱新思维。如何前瞻复苏时代的未来,哪些旧常识和新思维需
  • [3/23]公务员结构化面试高分策略分享(18:30)

  • [会议讲座] 第20230323期 总第2664期本文内容转载自华政研究生原文链接:https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/FJOsHv62pDMoMfgaPt8JcA内容版权归原官方所有,如有侵权请联系我们删除如
  • 疫情“后遗症”:男女薪资差重新拉大

  • ”每年妇女节前后,《经济学人》都会发布有关职场赋权女性的玻璃天花板指数。今年最新指数显示,在多数经合组织成员国中,男女薪资差在经历了之前逐年缩小后,在2021年又重新被拉大
  • 图解华尔街“量子金融”竞赛 | 商论精选

  • ”放眼当今金融界,由算法驱动的高频交易的交易量已经超过了人工交易。如今华尔街大银行又盯上了另一项尖端技术——量子计算。有量子计算加持的量化投资机构希望通过加速资产
  • ChatGPT将碾压人类?AI投资的历史给出反例

  • ”对冲基金的经历表明AI有能力彻底改变商业——但同时也表明这需要时间,而且进展可能时断时续。在2020年和2021年初,大多数量化基金的表现不如人类操盘的对冲基金,也低于市场平
  • 「经济学人」No flies on Kenya

  • No flies on KenyaHow an east African country became an odd sort of global powerhouseA cottage industry that adorns fishing rods on rivers across the worldRed-ey
  • 航运双巨头分道扬镳,折射全球贸易的未来

  • ”在航运业这个全球贸易的核心行业中,位列最前的两家公司MSC和马士基年初表示将在2025年结束联盟关系,各奔前程。后疫情时代,两巨头对未来发展的押注方向为何截然不同?这一切发
  • ChatGPT的时代,如何做一个独立思考者?

  • 3月15日凌晨,离发布仅仅四个多月,在 ChatGPT 展现了惊人的实力之后,OpenAI 又扔下一颗核弹:GPT-4 发布了。GPT-4 有多强?GPT-4 是一个多模态大型语言模型,使用了1.5万亿个参数,比 G

热门文章

  • “复活”半年后 京东拍拍二手杀入公益事业

  • 京东拍拍二手“复活”半年后,杀入公益事业,试图让企业捐的赠品、家庭闲置品变成实实在在的“爱心”。 把“闲置品”变爱心 6月12日,“益心一益·守护梦想每一步”2018年四

最新文章

  • 「经济学人」Lunar living

  • Lunar livingPressurised natural caves could offer a home from home on the MoonIt would make building bases a lot cheaper and easierImagine a habitable colony on
  • ADC小药企集体狂欢:三天翻倍,最高涨幅3000%+

  • 近一个季度以来,默沙东花费百亿美元引入了科伦博泰多款抗体偶联药物(ADC),辉瑞以430亿美元收购了ADC巨头Seagen,以及阿斯利康重金引入康诺亚的ADC药物,ADC领域重新成为市场的焦点