服务粉丝

我们一直在努力
当前位置:首页 > 财经 >

赵明昊:Asia-Pacific needs to rethink

日期: 来源:清华大学战略与安全研究中心收集编辑:赵明昊


Zhao Minghao

Professor at the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University, nonresident Senior Fellow of CISS, Tsinghua University and a China Forum Expert



MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

The region should utilize its resources for improving people's lives instead of in military races

The US government has recently announced its federal budgets for fiscal year 2024 stressing an increase in diplomatic and military inputs in the Indo-Pacific region. It highlighted that the next decade will be decisive for the rivalry between China and the United States.

The US has used the Russia-Ukraine conflict to hype up the China threat and develop exclusive military and security blocs through the Pacific Deterrence Initiative and the Indo-Pacific Partnership for Maritime Domain Awareness among other schemes, which will increase confrontation and instability in the region.

To improve strategic competition with China, the Biden administration has consolidated bilateral alliances with Japan, the Republic of Korea and the Philippines, and has been making lots of efforts in courting the regional partners of India and Vietnam in the Indo-Pacific. The US has been trying to improve security backup for the Indo-Pacific strategy by paying greater attention to the QUAD with Japan, India and Australia, developing trilateral security partnership with the United Kingdom and Australia, and bringing European/NATO forces to Asia.

Under the Biden administration's Indo-Pacific strategy, the US-Japan-India-Australia Quadrilateral Security is aimed at building an overarching coalition to impose all-round pressure on China. Besides joint military exercises, the QUAD members are also engaged in increasingly close cooperation on economic, maritime and public health security, key and emerging technologies, cybersecurity, chip supply chain and space cooperation. The QUAD is also courting more countries in the Indo-Pacific region, especially the ROK and Indonesia, to counterbalance China.

The India-Israel-United Arab Emirates-US (I2U2) cooperation mechanism may develop closer ties with the US-Japan-India-Australia mechanism. On Oct 18, 2021, foreign ministers of the US, India, Israel and the UAE held a meeting to discuss political, economic and trade ties, and maritime security cooperation, marking official establishment of the mechanism.

According to Kabir Taneja, a researcher at the Strategy and Technology Center of India-based Observer Research Foundation, the quadrilateral mechanism in West Asia shows that India-US cooperation has progressed further. The two quadrilateral mechanisms in the East and the West will reinforce each other to curb China's influence.

The US has also stepped up efforts to improve the trilateral security pact between Australia, the UK and the US, known as AUKUS which was established in September 2021. The three countries unveiled detailed measures on March 13 to help Australia acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

AUKUS also focuses on strengthening cooperation on cutting-edge military technology and defense industries, which reflects the US policy of outsourcing defense capability. The mechanism focuses on cutting-edge military technologies including hypersonic and anti-hypersonic, electronic warfare, cyberwarfare, artificial intelligence and quantum technology. The military-industrial bloc of AUKUS is furthering cooperation, seeking to integrate defense supply chains and Defense Industrial Bases and launching research, development and production of military equipment and ammunition jointly.

The Biden administration has hyped up civilian security challenges through issues such as maritime security and further expanded the influence of the UK, the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Indo-Pacific region.The Biden administration has laid greater focus on addressing civil security challenges such as illegal fishing in the Asia-Pacific. The US seeks to pressure China through such soft security issues, increase costs for China to improve its global reputation and increase difficulties for China to handle relations with neighboring countries and promote regional cooperation.

The Biden administration has also expanded the link between Europe and the Indo-Pacific geopolitical blocs to back up its strategy of tying China and Russia and imposing pressure on the two countries to increase the leverage over China. In January, the UK and Japan signed the Reciprocal Access Agreement, an alliance-oriented security agreement. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited Japan in March. Defense ministers of Germany and Japan said they will increase joint exercises and cooperate more on military technology.

With the promotion of the US' Indo-Pacific strategy, risks of confrontation are rising, and military races are casting a shadow over the Indo-Pacific region.

Countries in the Asia-Pacific region need to rethink the long-term challenges brought by confrontation, strengthen their strategic communication, and reduce misunderstanding and misjudgment. The countries should cope with fragmented regional security issues and utilize resources to improve people's wellbeing and development rather than on arms races so as to safeguard peace in the Asia-Pacific region.

First, countries in the Asia-Pacific region need to draw lessons from the Ukraine conflict. Confrontation between blocs will intensify countries' sense of insecurity and even lead to military conflicts. A new NATO with China as its imaginary enemy is not what the Asia-Pacific region wants or needs. The region needs common, comprehensive and sustainable security. Second, China's defense spending and military capabilities should not be exaggerated. The security challenges China faces come from the US and its alliances, whose overall military expenditure is much higher than China's. The Global Security Initiative proposed by China is not empty talk and the test is whether it can be implemented in the Asia-Pacific region. Third, we need to build up an Association of Southeast Asian Nations-centered security governance framework in the Asia-Pacific, maintain existing mechanisms such as ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting and the East Asia Summit, and address non-traditional security issues such as food and energy security and counter-terrorism that can affect long-term development of most countries in the region. Fourth, countries in the Asia-Pacific region need to engage in more dialogues on security challenges from emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, and address excessive securitization of the economic and technological relations which does harm to the region's stability and prosperity.


The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily.
This article was first published on China Daily on April 17, 2023
向上滑动阅览


相关阅读


赵明昊:乌克兰危机如何影响美国联盟体系的重塑?
赵明昊|把控世界政治“拐点”:美国国家安全战略的调整

赵明昊:美国构建亚太“小多边”机制的进展、特征与影响

赵明昊:勿夸大中国对乌克兰危机影响力

赵明昊:美国国会激烈斗争令中美关系承压

赵明昊:拜登政府对外战略在应对地缘冲突和推进战略竞争之间权衡
赵明昊︱中美竞合:凛冬将至,中国需更加重视周边安全
赵明昊:中美需共同应对全球“危机时刻”
赵明昊:党的二十大对中美关系意味着什么
赵明昊:美国国家安全战略聚焦“中国挑战”
赵明昊:火上浇油的“台湾政策法案”
赵明昊:俄乌冲突对中美关系的影响论析
赵明昊:美国的“芯片焦虑”与对华竞争
赵明昊:中美博弈催化中国周边外交变局
赵明昊:拜登日韩之行的深意
赵明昊:俄乌冲突背景下的台海危局
赵明昊:审慎精巧应对与美“战略相持”
赵明昊:俄乌冲突激化全球“数字竞争”
赵明昊:俄乌冲突与中美关系
赵明昊:拜登政府印太战略的新意与困境

赵明昊:对焦中国的拜登政府全球战略调整

赵明昊:试析中美“战略竞争”及其管理

赵明昊:“民主峰会”让世界审视美国

赵明昊:中美元首共同反对“新冷战”

赵明昊:中国想要什么样的国际秩序?

赵明昊:美国对阿富汗的“民主改造”为什么失败了?

赵明昊:美国因阿富汗危机蒙羞,战略失败却仍在“幻想”之中

赵明昊 | 来易来,去难去:塔利班与美国的恩怨简史

赵明昊:美国的制衡阻挡不了“一带一路”前进方向

赵明昊 | 红色警报:如何在危局中寻求“中美相处之道”?

赵明昊:拜登政府对华战略的“1234”

赵明昊|伙伴以上,同盟未满:拜登怎么打“印度牌”?

赵明昊 安刚:从拜登政府相关表态看其对华政策趋势

赵明昊:中美能跳起“小步舞”吗?

赵明昊:拜登对待国内危机的态度,是改善中美关系的契机

赵明昊:拜登政府外交战略的三大特征

赵明昊:拜登如何面对“特朗普外交政策遗产”

赵明昊:美国重返多边主义,中国需要担心吗?

赵明昊:中美关系的“战略突围”

赵明昊:从Tik Tok事件看美国对华战略竞争

赵明昊:当拜登面对“特朗普主义”

赵明昊:社会空前分裂下的美国“政治疫情”

赵明昊:美国民主党的对华政策,呈何种取向?

赵明昊:新冠肺炎疫情与美国对华战略竞争的深化

赵明昊:特朗普若再次当选,加强版“美国优先”将如何影响中国?

赵明昊:美国攻防并举,加码“技术竞争”

赵明昊:如何面对一个“裂痕美国”

赵明昊:美台关系会走多远?

赵明昊:美国想靠讲故事打败中国?

赵明昊:美国对华加大压制的四大趋向

赵明昊:警惕美国极端对华政策“暴走”

赵明昊:美国病了,美国人醒了?

赵明昊:警惕美国对华政策的“俄罗斯化”

赵明昊:煽动对抗不是应对“美国之困”的良策

赵明昊:超100000人死亡,特朗普制造的“死亡陷阱”够埋吗?

赵明昊:莫让“叙事之战”搅乱了供应链

赵明昊:中美关系能否扛过疫情风暴

赵明昊:美国在阿富汗的“国家建设”缘何失败

赵明昊:中国医生与中美抗疫合作

赵明昊:疫情如何影响中美经贸关系

相关阅读

  • 《CISS战略与安全大事记》东南亚和大洋洲篇-3月

  • 编者按自2021年7月起,清华大学战略与安全研究中心特别推出“战略与安全大事记”,由中心主任达巍老师主持编写。大事记以月度为单位,以区域为分组标准,旨在追踪和记录美国及加拿
  • 《CISS战略与安全大事记》美国篇-3月

  • 编者按自2021年7月起,清华大学战略与安全研究中心特别推出“战略与安全大事记”,由中心主任达巍老师主持编写。大事记以月度为单位,以区域为分组标准,旨在追踪和记录美国及加拿
  • 别了,中国前首富!

  • 导语眼看起朱楼、宴宾客,眼看楼塌了。今日免费下载:2022有色金属铝行业研究报告来源:市值观察作者:文雨4月13日,集刘忠田毕生心血的中国忠旺,将正式从香港联交所摘牌。曾经的亚洲
  • 关于“新冷战”的几点思考

  • 跟几位学界朋友餐叙,探讨天下大势,其中一个主题是美方试图发动的新冷战。对此,我有以下几点不成熟的思考,供朋友们批判。一、新冷战已经开始了吗?目前的态势是,一大半美国人(共和党
  • 司马南:​中国没资格当看客

  • 以牙还牙,以眼还眼,投桃报李,来而不往非礼也。美国向来霸道不讲理,这事儿倒在无法容忍但可以理解的范围之内。最让人不能理解的是,瑞士这样的国家,二战时期都标榜中立,现在居然撕下

热门文章

  • “复活”半年后 京东拍拍二手杀入公益事业

  • 京东拍拍二手“复活”半年后,杀入公益事业,试图让企业捐的赠品、家庭闲置品变成实实在在的“爱心”。 把“闲置品”变爱心 6月12日,“益心一益·守护梦想每一步”2018年四
  • 美国对华2000亿关税清单,到底影响有多大?

  • 1 今天A股大跌,上证最大跌幅超过2%。直接导火索是美国证实计划对华2000亿美元产品加征25%关税。 听起来,2000亿美元数目巨大,我们来算笔账。 2000亿美元,按现在人民币汇率

最新文章

  • 赵明昊:Asia-Pacific needs to rethink

  • Zhao MinghaoProfessor at the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University, nonresident Senior Fellow of CISS, Tsinghua University and a China Forum Ex
  • 《CISS战略与安全大事记》东南亚和大洋洲篇-3月

  • 编者按自2021年7月起,清华大学战略与安全研究中心特别推出“战略与安全大事记”,由中心主任达巍老师主持编写。大事记以月度为单位,以区域为分组标准,旨在追踪和记录美国及加拿
  • 中国论坛特约专家唐晓阳接受赫芬顿邮报采访

  • 4月3日,清华大学国际关系学系系主任、中国论坛特约专家唐晓阳接受了赫芬顿邮报(The Huffington Post)希腊版的采访,对中美关系、中欧关系、台湾问题、中国在乌克兰危机中的立场
  • 《CISS战略与安全大事记》美国篇-3月

  • 编者按自2021年7月起,清华大学战略与安全研究中心特别推出“战略与安全大事记”,由中心主任达巍老师主持编写。大事记以月度为单位,以区域为分组标准,旨在追踪和记录美国及加拿